PDA

View Full Version : Michael Moore + 9/11 film + LAWSUIT


kinein
06-01-2006, 03:17 AM
Enjoy the bill Moore.

Iraq Veteran Sues Moore Over 9/11 Film
Wednesday May 31 6:25 PM ET

A veteran who lost both arms in the war in Iraq is suing filmmaker Michael Moore for $85 million, alleging that Moore used snippets of a television interview without his permission to falsely portray him as anti-war in "Fahrenheit 9/11."

Sgt. Peter Damon, a National Guardsman from Middleborough, is asking for damages because of "loss of reputation, emotional distress, embarrassment, and personal humiliation," according to the lawsuit filed in Suffolk Superior Court last week.

Damon, 33, claims that Moore never asked for his consent to use a clip from an interview Damon did with NBC's "Nightly News."

ADVERTISEMENT
He lost his arms when a tire on a Black Hawk helicopter exploded while he and another reservist were servicing the aircraft on the ground. Another reservist was killed in the explosion.

In his interview with NBC, Damon was asked about a new painkiller the military was using on wounded veterans. He claims in his lawsuit that the way Moore used the film clip in "Fahrenheit 9/11" Moore's scathing 2004 documentary criticizing the Bush administration and the war in Iraq makes him appear to "voice a complaint about the war effort" when he was actually complaining about "the excruciating type of pain" that comes with the injury he suffered.

In the movie, Damon is shown lying on a gurney, with his wounds bandaged. He says he feels likes he's "being crushed in a vise."

"But they (the painkillers) do a lot to help it," he says. "And they take a lot of the edge off of it."

Damon is shown shortly after U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., is speaking about the Bush administration and says, "You know, they say they're not leaving any veterans behind, but they're leaving all kinds of veterans behind."

Damon contends that Moore's positioning of the clip just after the congressman's comments makes him appear as if he feels like he was "left behind" by the Bush administration and the military.

In his lawsuit, Damon says he "agrees with and supports the President and the United States' war effort, and he was not left behind."

He said that, while at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center recovering from his wounds, he had surgery and physical therapy, learned to use prosthetics and live independently. He also said that Homes For Our Troops, a not-for-profit group, built him a house with handicapped accessibility.

"The work creates a substantially fictionalized and falsified implication as a wounded serviceman who was left behind when Plaintiff was not left behind but supported, financially and emotionally, by the active assistance of the President, the United States and his family, friends, acquaintances and community," Damon says in his lawsuit.

Moore did not immediately return calls seeking comment Wednesday. A message was left for Moore at a personal number in New York and with HarperCollins, publisher of Moore's 2002 book, "Stupid White Men...And Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation!"

A spokesman for Miramax Film Corp., also named as a defendant, did not immediately return a call.

Damon did not immediately respond to a request for an interview.

"It's upsetting to him because he's lived his life supportive of his government, he's been a patriot, he's been a soldier, and he's now being portrayed in a movie that is the antithesis of all of that," Damon's lawyer, Dennis Lynch, said.

Damon is seeking $75 million in damages for emotional distress and loss of reputation. His wife is suing for an additional $10 million in damages because of the mental distress caused to her husband, Lynch said.

___

Editor's Note: Denise Lavoie is a Boston-based reporter covering the courts and legal issues. She can be reached at dlavoie(at)ap.org


http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20060531/114912510000.html

OmegaBob
06-01-2006, 10:28 AM
Ha! I was just about to post this!
graemlins/av_cheesygrin.gif

* * * * * * *

Stupid Twinkie Boy! I hope this lawsuit teaches you a lesson!

kyleh
06-01-2006, 03:15 PM
Somehow I get the feeling that this is going to turn out to be a big win for Michael Moore.

Wingnut
06-01-2006, 03:25 PM
Originally posted by kyleh:
Somehow I get the feeling that this is going to turn out to be a big win for Michael Moore. The liberal activist judges will obviously stack the courts in Moore's favor, thats why.... duh.

kyleh
06-01-2006, 03:36 PM
Well, either way he's going to get a lot of free advertising. hehe

People rarely talked about this movie anymore last week, now it's going to be all over the press again.

Autocratic
06-01-2006, 04:19 PM
Uh, $85M? Sounds like they're both douche bags.

Edit: Upon further review, Moore did nothing wrong here and anyone that says otherwise is ridiculous.

Chip
06-02-2006, 08:21 AM
Moore did do many things wrong and the fat (guess the word) deserves all the bad he gets.

zauggru
06-02-2006, 08:52 AM
Originally posted by Autocratic:
Uh, $85M? Sounds like they're both douche bags.

Edit: Upon further review, Moore did nothing wrong here and anyone that says otherwise is ridiculous. Editing a film so that words are taken out of context is not wrong? Moore manipulated the mans words to make it appear he did not support the Iraq war. I guess that is normal for a propoganda film anyway.

Autocratic
06-02-2006, 02:12 PM
Originally posted by zauggru:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Autocratic:
Uh, $85M? Sounds like they're both douche bags.

Edit: Upon further review, Moore did nothing wrong here and anyone that says otherwise is ridiculous. Editing a film so that words are taken out of context is not wrong? Moore manipulated the mans words to make it appear he did not support the Iraq war. I guess that is normal for a propoganda film anyway. </font>[/QUOTE]Even if it was entirely malicious, if this idiot thinks his reputation (political reputation, mind you) is worth that much, he's borderline ******ed. Moore had a clip of him saying he's in pain, and the claim that his words were taken out of context is a stretch, to say the least. I understand that people don't like Moore - I don't either - but that doesn't mean that frivolous suits from money grubbing idiots need to be given more credence than necessary.

kyleh
06-02-2006, 02:15 PM
If I were Michael Moore (I might be) I would pay a guy that was in my movie a few hundred thousand dollars to wait a couple of years and launch a high-profile lawsuit against me so that I could make more money on DVD sales. I think it would more than even out.

Not to denigrate the veteran, I'm just sayin' I don't think he's going to get his 85 mil, but I think MM will get a few.

dnsbubba
06-02-2006, 07:49 PM
One small problem with this complaint..if NBC followed procedure, he can't sue Moore.

He doesn't own the rights to the interview that was used, NBC does.